Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (117678)	3/24/2004 7:38:32 AM
From: DRBES	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

This is the third time that the the MaGEEK has put his reputation (HHHHHHMMMMM?) on the line on this one. Perhaps this time he really does know something factual.

To: Dan3 who wrote (117678)	3/24/2004 11:02:48 AM
From: Tomcat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

You can bet there will be a lot of hints from Intel to serverworks about information access being cut off. That was what drove ServerWorks to AMD in the first place.

To: Dan3 who wrote (117678)	3/26/2004 10:07:20 PM
From: ptanner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

re: "You can bet there will be a lot of hints from Intel to serverworks about information access being cut off. " Wasn't this one of the issues in the Intel-Intergraph lawsuits? Or a secondary impact which became an issue rather when Intel apparently responded to the dispute. Since this was settled through mediation the validity of the 'abuse' was not resolved but seems obvious IMHO. I would think Intel (or any other near/monopolist) would have to be reasonably even-handed in its information provided to third-party developers. -PT