SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (9892)3/24/2004 12:07:46 PM
From: H-ManRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Your post is one of the most lame attempts at obfuscation that I have ever seen.

Setting aside for the moment, the numerous mis-representations, and accepting for the moment the premise that the Democrats are the go-to-war party, you are comparing the Democratic party's history to the Republican. But you see, it is not the democratic party that is running for office. John Kerry is, and John Kerry has the voting record in the senate that is questionable, at best.

ONly someone who has gone to war, only someone who has a history of working with and using the intelligence in a battlefield would have the sufficient background to lead a nation into war and then lead it out of it when the goals are achieved.

FDR had a war record? Clinton?

As I said, it is simply one of the most lame attempts at obfuscation I have ever seen. Hardly worthy of a Kerry voter.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (9892)3/24/2004 1:51:59 PM
From: SrexleyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
"Clinton was intelligent"
True

"a Rhodes scholar"
Never completed the program. He was invited to the program, but don't you have to finish it to be a Rhodes scholar?



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (9892)3/26/2004 7:29:19 AM
From: Tom ClarkeRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
You're about as predictable as a morning dump...