SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (36500)3/26/2004 2:32:50 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794379
 
We all know guys like clark. They are wannabees. He probably has convinced himself that he had all the answers back then. But his problem is that he only imagines that he had the balls to take a stand back then, if he actually had those conclusions back then. He has built himself up way out of proportions. He is a bureaucrat and policy maker wannabee. It is easy to go back in time and say you were for or against things after the fact. Yeah you may have a thought back then but as it was one of a million thoughts and now you just go pick that one and build it up. Mike



To: John Carragher who wrote (36500)3/26/2004 4:12:28 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 794379
 
whether Clarke lied under oath ....... the request had come from House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Rep. Porter Goss, the chairman of the House intelligence committee.

Obviously, they think they have got him. In Dem terms, a "lying liar who lied."


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News