Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: microhoogle! who wrote (556300)	3/26/2004 2:26:14 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

Buy-A-Potti looks up from the bottom of the food chain and thinks he has a good view. What a joke...

To: microhoogle! who wrote (556300)	3/26/2004 2:33:57 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Murali, What does Clarke#1 destroying Clarke#2's credibility have to do with Bush? Clarke#2 accusing Clarke#1 of lying is even more silly. Steve

To: microhoogle! who wrote (556300)	3/26/2004 2:58:55 PM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Numbers May Indicate Media Bias on Richard Clarke Story By Susan Jones CNSNews.com Morning Editor March 26, 2004 (CNSNews.com) - While hundreds of news reports mentioned Richard Clarke's criticism of Bush administration, relatively few of those reports also mentioned documents contradicting key elements of what Clarke said. A search of the NEXIS news database shows that from March 24 through March 26, there were 872 news reports mentioning the name Richard Clarke. Clarke is the former counterterrorism official who expressed support for the Bush administration when he worked at the Bush White House -- then blasted the Bush administration when he left. Clarke's new book, saying that terrorism was not a priority for the Bush administration, came out this week, apparently timed to coincide with Clarke's appearance on Wednesday before the commission investigating the events leading up to 9/11. Hundreds of news reports from March 24-46 discussed Clarke's contention that the Bush administration did not do all it could have done to protect the American people from the 9/11 terrorist attacks. A NEXIS search of "Richard Clarke/Fox" and "Richard Clarke/Fox News" turned up only 130 stories, however. A search of Richard Clarke/Chris Shays and Richard Clarke/Christopher Shays turned up 10 stories. And a search for Richard Clarke/Fox/Chris Shays turned up only 2 stories. The two-day search of the NEXIS news database was conducted at 7:10 a.m. EST Friday. cnsnews.com

To: microhoogle! who wrote (556300)	3/26/2004 2:59:53 PM
From: PROLIFE	Respond to of 769670

registeredmedia.com

To: microhoogle! who wrote (556300)	3/26/2004 4:44:10 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Even if they manage to find some inconsistencies in Clarke it will affect Bush negatively for trying to make this a political witch hunt. Keep at it!! You are absolutely correct. Only the democrats have the right to lie. George Bush has no right to defend himself, no matter how scurrilous the attacks on him. and the country. What an awful man! KM By the way. What level is required to for"some inconsistencies"????