Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: microhoogle! who wrote (556363)	3/26/2004 7:30:01 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Even if I were to assume the worst case scenario that Richard Clarke perjured the first time, it will make Dumbya team bad. All I am saying REVENGE is clouding the thinking of some eminent politicos in Washington DC. If they keep it up, they will be setting themselves in a lose lose situation. Now either you can rant at me or shoot my theory down with a counter argument. Your choice. You seem to be confused as to whom is seeking revenge. The demohacks have been at it since 11/2/2000. The 'ten little indians' running for president elect have spent millions disparaging, yea lying, about President Bush for the last year, and now they have new champion, although a liar, yet you are not sure why I brought them into the conversation. Strangely enough, during the 2 "60 Minutes" segments Clarke pumped his book , CBS never 'happened' to mention a division of CBS's parent company was the publisher of the book, as they were, also, for the other tell all guy, O'Neill. It seems what has happened is the democrats lie so loudly and so often their rantings are acepted as "truth'. I believe that theory of expounding lies originated with the Demohacks hero, Josef Goebbels, of the Third Reich fame. Long enough, loud enough, it then becomes truth. Incidentally, do you think Clarke fears some of his previous statements may be declassified, or is he depending on the hope they will not be? Seems he did take an oath, or doesn't that mean anything to the those on the left. follow Bill clinton, I guess. This fellow could be in some deep doodoo. I guess the truth is, as one fellow on TV said the other eve, regarding Clarke's motivations for lying, "he has written a book, hasn't he, he wants a little something for his trust fund"? Rant on. Murpi KM