Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (7531)	3/26/2004 10:44:05 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Re: The admin is going after Clarke's testimony in public vs his previous testimony in private. If they don't get him for perjury They can't possibly get him for perjury, since he has gotten approval for every "revelation" he is making. He had the highest clearances in the government, except for the handful of people who were able to make the Air Force and NORAD stand down on 9/11. Clarke isn't going to violate his oath to sworn secrecy. That would be treason, a capital offense. And Clarke isn't dumb. He's just tantalizing us with a glimpse of the real truth. Remember, there is a huge amount of information available to the insiders that we don't get to look at, or think about.