Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (185614)	3/27/2004 9:43:33 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1587205

Do you find it interesting that the Bush admin did precisely what the Clinton admin recommended before 9/11; only they did it after 9/11? (With the exception of Iraq). I think it is pretty clear the Clinton administration was not on top of the problem (after all, Clinton did pass on multiple opportunities to have bin Laden handed to him). I also think it is clear the Bush administration wasn't until 9/11. But as was pointed out in the hearings, there are various causes for it, including the appointment and confirmation process which allows the Senate to hold up nominees for political reasons. This is a partisan political attack. Kerry has taken a lesson from the Clinton play book. The lies about the economy have started coming out -- the economy is GREAT right now, yet Kerry would have you believe we're in the middle of the Great Depression. And they have cooked up this lying account of what happened in regard to terrorism, when America knows damned well the Bush administration has excelled in the war on terror.