Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (10245)	3/27/2004 5:50:24 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

<<If they are different - should he be tried for perjury?>> Of course they'll be different, but if he committed perjury, absolutely he should be prosecuted. But it's a bluff, a way to smear him without ever presenting any evidence. Even Frist admits he was merely smearing Clarke on the floor of the Senate: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4601195/ “Mr. Clarke has told two entirely different stories under oath,” Frist said in a speech from the Senate floor, alleging that Clarke said in 2002 that the Bush administration actively sought to address the threat posed by al-Qaida before the attacks. Frist later retreated from directly accusing Clarke of perjury, telling reporters that he personally had no knowledge that there were any discrepancies between Clarke’s two appearances. Hit and run, that's all you guys know. Steve Dietrich