Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10311)	3/28/2004 9:18:03 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Clinton had 8 years, Bush had 8 months. Even in the span of 8 years Clinton did not let his guard down so as to enable AQ to strike here in the US . And in a short span of 8 months, Bush fell asleep and the AQ struck. In the balance 3 1/2 years the price he has paid to keep AQ away from the shores of the US is phenomenal. Question people need to ask as they decide if Bush deserves a second time or not.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10311)	3/28/2004 10:46:31 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Why did Clinton order the CIA to only capture bin Ladin, not kill him? Boy you are a bone head aren't you? The order was to capture or kill. The same order that Bush had for him...and the same order that Bush had for Saddam. Why capture you say? The reason you want to capture a Saddam or a bin Laden is because they are valuable alive. Because they can be interrogated and much about the organization can be discovered. The order capture or kill means capture him if you can, but kill him if you can't. You gotta quit reading those hate sites dude. It's mushing up your brain. Orca