Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vitas who wrote (7695)	3/28/2004 11:44:18 AM
From: twmoore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Vistas,you may have read what I posted but you did not comprehend a word that you read.

To: Vitas who wrote (7695)	3/28/2004 7:26:58 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Iraq wasn't about freedom. Iraq was about obtaining military bases in the middle east to secure our oil supplies for the coming century. China has 2.5 billion people who want to drive, and they'll need gasoline. So will the rising middle classes in India. We needed bases outside of Saudi Arabia, to make Osama happier and to have some leverage over the Saudis, but right next door in case we need to swoop in and "protect" their oil too. Our troops will be there 'till the oil runs dry. Bedlam in Iraq serves this purpose, and will continue. Wake up and smell the petrol - Bush and Cheney are oil men.