Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (127574)	3/28/2004 1:34:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But did pursuing Al Q become their top priority after 98. There is nothing that suggests it did not Then there's not much to suggest that becoming Clinton's "top priority" leads to any results, either. What did they DO, as opposed to talk about or think about doing? As far as I can see the Clinton administration gave an order to kill Bin Laden, while making it clear through their legalistic attitude, and memories of previous hearings still being fresh, that if the CIA missed or bungled in any way, the agency would be hung out to dry. So, surprise!, the agency didn't care to move until it had 100% certainty and clearance from the lawyers, which of course never happened. Did Clinton put ANY special forces on the ground in Afghanistan?