Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (10424)	3/28/2004 4:48:18 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 81568

Ann, I consider Bush WEAK on terrorism. Let me explain: I supported Bush when we attacked Afghanistan for harboring Bin Laden and al qaeda. I believe any President would have done the same. However, early on, the Bush administration made the tactical error of using mercenaries at Tora Bora (The ancient Greeks knew not to use mercenaries in a siege). This was a horrible mistake, but we all make tactical errors, so I was prepared to forgive this mistake. I assumed (incorrectly) that Bush would redouble his efforts to pursue the perpetrators of 9/11. I also supported Bush when he demanded that the UN inspectors be allowed to return to Iraq. For me (and most of the World that supported Bush on this point) this was separate from the war against terrorism. But Bush went further, he made the strategic error of conflating nation states (like Iraq) with undeterrable terrorist groups like al qaeda. He also made the strategic error of conflating mustard gas with nuclear weapons. These strategic errors led to the mistaken policy of invading Iraq. This also led to another tactical error: removing the Fifth Group Special Forces (most of our Pastun and Dari speakers, and many of our Arabic speakers) from Afghanistan for redeployment in Iraq. The US also redeployed our only RC 135 spy planes from Afghanistan to Iraq. Clearly, Bush lost focus. The reason is obvious; he made a series of strategic errors that led directly to more tactical errors. Bush has tried to replace “moral clarity” (Good vs. Evil) for strategic clarity. The result is a confused strategy on terrorism. Defeating terrorism requires a clear strategy: 1) Pursuing the perpetrators of 9/11, relentlessly, to the ends of the Earth. 2) Defending our country from terrorist attacks. 3) Pursuing a foreign policy that changes the breeding ground for terrorism (Bush has ignored this area). After 2 ½ years, Bush should be able to go before the American people and explain his overall strategy without resorting to platitudes (“good vs. Evil” or “with us or against us” or other meaningless statements). On this count, Bush has failed miserably.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (10424)	3/28/2004 8:39:18 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Ann, there is nothing terroristic in what I said. You could turn it and twist it the way you want to. There are people like you who have say that OBL would vote for Kerry. These people profess to know OBL's mind. I ask if so then they should know more about OBL than just whom OBL would vote for. Ann, fighting terrorism is not that black and white as you think. If you categorize my statement of "one, gone, three more to go" as terroristic, then I am not sure how you would categorize the statement "One dead, three more to go." Anyway, the movement is on to remove these leaders in a democratic way. They have failed to grasp how to combat terrorism. They have to go out and produce results. If after 2 1/2 years of military actions we still have the Spain bombings. If we are still uncovering bombs set to go off in train tracks in of all countries France, then these leaders know nothing about terrorism. You can try to put any spin that you may want to. The CIA aided and abetted OBL in the late 80's. Similarly, Musharraf also aided and betted Islamists and the Taliban as late as a year ago. So let us stop the spin and put in place people like Kerry who will go to work for us.