Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (557133)	3/28/2004 10:17:25 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Separation of powers....I am surprised you CS's do not remember that...with all the 'separation' you whine about.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (557133)	3/29/2004 12:01:25 AM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Richard Clarke was the one that said Condeleeza Rice had a blank look in her face when he said he tried to discuss al queada with her as if she didn't know what al queda is. If a republican had said that about a liberal black women in a position of power......or not......he would be denounced as a racist. Clarke's assertion leaves one with the impression that a black woman doesn't have much of a brain and can't possibly fathom what it takes to understand national or international affairs. A definite racist comment. And as we all know by now, Condeleeza Rice had an in depth discussion about al queda on a syndicated talk show in mid 2000. Clarke is not only a liar........he is a racist. Why am I not surprised that the left totally ignores that fact? M

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (557133)	3/29/2004 12:04:02 AM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

9/11 families recognize a person of little integrity when they see one. To them, Clarke is a sleezeball of the worse kind. M 9/11 Families Livid at Clarke's 'Profiteering' Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:20 a.m. EST 9/11 Families Livid at Clarke's 'Profiteering' Thirty-two family members of 9/11 victims have signed a blistering open letter to former terrorism czar Richard Clarke, accusing him of "profiteering" from the 9/11 tragedy by writing a book and acting to "divide America" with his testimony before the 9/11 Commission. "The notion of profiteering from anything associated with 9/11 is particularly offensive to all of us," the 9/11 familles wrote in a letter published in Sunday's New York Post. "We find Mr. Clarke's actions all the more offensive especially considering the fact that there was always a high possibility that the 9/11 Commission could be used for political gain, especially now, with the presidential election less than eight months away." The 9/11 families complained: "Surely, Mr. Clarke knew this. Yet he decided to risk the actual and perceived impartiality of this important process to maximize book sales. "As family and friends of those killed on 9/11, we believe it inappropriate for Mr. Clarke to profit from and politicize 9/11, and further divide America, by his testimony before the 9/11 Commission." newsmax.com Some 9/11 Families Criticize Clarke's Testimony wnbc.com