Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron who wrote (8883)	3/29/2004 12:04:02 AM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 20773

Rice is correct. Bush was right to ask whether Iraq had something to do with the WTC attack. And Clarke was wrong to express certainty that Iraq was innocent at such an early point before any investigation had taken place. This is especially true since Iraq had provided sanctuary to a principal in the first WTC attack in 1993. And since Clarke had said as recently as January 1999 that Iraqi intelligence and Al Qaeda had worked together ("..Clarke "said that intelligence exists linking bin Laden to El Shifa's current and past operators, the Iraqi nerve gas experts and the National Islamic Front in Sudan." nationalreview.com.