Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10638)	3/29/2004 7:59:02 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 81568

OOH-RAH!

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10638)	3/29/2004 8:23:44 PM
From: CalculatedRisk	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81568

Actually Kerry will re-engage on the war on terror (and not lose focus like Bush). Message 19960343 Just a correction for an error in your post (I am sure it was a typo). Obviously Bush is weak on terrorism and Kerry will be strong.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10638)	3/29/2004 9:27:36 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Any student of military science will say that the US cannot take on so many nations at a time militarily. The US military in Iraq is bogged down. Afghanistan is sucking in resources of the US military. And now they have resources to take on North Korea, Iran, Syria and Libya? Could it be that the Syrians and the Libyans are negotiating with Bush and demanding things knowing fully well that Bush is under duress because of the overstretched US military. I mean the Iraqi soldiers do not have body armor and they have to buy their own. Come folks, enough of rhetoric and propaganda. Time to sit back and put on your thinking caps.