Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (127727)	3/30/2004 11:05:30 AM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Did not "conveniently" choose not to mention the 93 WTC attack....why on earth did you think I started with 94 and since we had no Islamic militant attacks "ON US SOIL" for seven years and no invasions of Islamic states during that time, why not? Apparently invading Iraq has helped keep us safe for 2 1/2 years so why did we have 7 years of no attacks "ON US SOIL" by Islamic militants without any invasions? Also btw, what "emboldened" the 93 WTC attack.......the Gulf War? This needless invasion of Iraq has turned Iraq into an accelerated breeding ground for "emboldened" terrorists and the idea that somehow the US military is going to confine it to Iraq is ludicrous. So now explain why the invasion of Iraq has made us safer? Maybe you could also tell Spain how this invasion has made them and us safer