Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (8919)	3/30/2004 1:28:35 PM
From: redfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

They shouldn't be messing around like that, the consequences could be horrific. Need to send some black opps people in to take them out.

To: tsigprofit who wrote (8919)	3/30/2004 1:43:30 PM
From: Ron	Respond to of 20773

The White House's thrashing about claiming National Security Advisors haven't testified before congressional committees is hogwash. In the first place, the 9-11 commission members were appointed by the President, which makes the separation of powers argument weak at best. In the second place both Zbigniew Brzezinski and Sandy Berger made sworn testimony before congressional panels, while they were in office. The White House statement today that its OK if Condi testifies, but they can't ask for any more public testimony from White House officials, raises the interesting question, what if Rice's testimony directly contradicts Richard Clarke's? They'd need to get testimony from more folks. I believe the operative word here is stonewalling. back-to-iraq.com