SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (127841)3/30/2004 3:33:28 PM
From: Sam  Respond to of 281500
 
The Secret of Their Success
by Karen Kwiatkowski

The New York Times has discovered the secret, and they printed it on the front page!

On Monday, 29 March 2004, the Times reports "American soldiers shut down a popular Baghdad newspaper on Sunday and tightened chains across the doors after the occupation authorities accused it of printing lies that incited violence."

Printing lies that incited violence? Glory be! Say it ain’t so!

Well, at least we can trust that when our own "Fab Five" – Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Perle – make over the fashion disaster of Iraq that this kind of thing won’t happen anymore. And if I may for a moment play "Congressional psychic" and read the mind of one Representative Henry Waxman, allow me to channel this:

"Yeah, right."

You may peruse at your leisure the exhaustive "Iraq on the Record: The Bush Administration’s Public Statements on Iraq." It was requested by Representative Waxman, and contains the hard facts about current presidential deceit, including the

237 misleading statements about the threat posed by Iraq that were made by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell, and National Security Advisor Rice. These statements were made in 125 separate appearances, consisting of 40 speeches, 26 press conferences and briefings, 53 interviews, 4 written statements, and 2 congressional testimonies. Most of the statements in the database were misleading because they expressed certainty where none existed or failed to acknowledge the doubts of intelligence officials. Ten of the statements were simply false.
[EDIT: Here is the link to the doc she is referencing: house.gov ]

This user-friendly document shows how the propaganda campaign worked, and sheds some interesting light on another issue: why Condi Rice may be a bit uncomfortable with that oath about the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

On page 6, the Congressional database of official Iraq war propaganda reveals, "Although Ms. Rice had the fewest public appearances and the fewest misleading statements, she had the highest number of statements – 8 – that were false."

The report also provides a useful visual aid, showing when the Bush-Cheney fabrications were spiking, and when their lies were more modestly put forth.

As you can see, there are certain times when White House lying on Iraq peaked, and certain times when they didn’t lie noticeably on Iraq or the reasons for war, invasion, occupation, nation-building and all that jazz.

Well, you can bet that the Jerry Bremer, the stylish head of the Coalition Provisional Authority and with power over all he surveys in Iraq, has a similar chart covering the lies of the Al Hawza newspaper, an 8-page broad sheet "known for printing wild rumors, especially anti-American ones." Some diligent reporter ought to ask for it, and put some of that $87 billion to work.

The Al Hawza paper is considered "a mouthpiece for Moktada al-Sadr, a fiery young Shiite cleric and one of the most outspoken critics of the Americans."

Sounds like Moktada al Sadr might be right at home with some senior administration officials, who were apparently setting the mendacity standard on Iraq back in 2002 and 2003.

An Al Hawza news editor, Saadoon Mohsen Thamad, responded to the suggestion that he might be back in business in 60 days, with, "We have been evicted from our offices, and we have no jobs…How are we going to continue?"

This is certainly a valid observation for Thamad. It is also an excellent question for the lying, rumor-mongering, and dishonest Bush Administration to consider before they themselves are staring dumfounded at padlocks over the front gates.

March 30, 2004

Karen Kwiatkowski [send her mail] is a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final four and a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives with her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley, and writes a bi-weekly column on defense issues with a libertarian perspective for militaryweek.com.

Copyright © 2004 LewRockwell.com

Karen Kwiatkowski Archives

Find this article at:
lewrockwell.com



To: KLP who wrote (127841)3/30/2004 3:33:49 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
<For any who have listened to her, they know how smart, articulate and honest she is.> Rice? Rice is the best argument against affirmative action that I have ever seen. She should have been fired a long time ago. In an Administration full of people with issues and shortcomings, she is arguably the weakest link. She should be thankful that as an advisor she cannot be held accountable for anything more serious than gross incompetence.