Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (16849)	3/30/2004 4:36:09 PM
From: Scott Bergquist	Respond to of 28931

It looks as if the answer of "it is not important" is enough to slay any inquiry and lay it to rest. If the physical appearance of Jesus is "not important" then perhaps we can dispense with the human figure on the cross, and use the "AOL guy" nailed on the cross in churches. After all, it is the "spirit" NOT the particular 'image' that is important. "not important"-- a useful way to dismiss something you don't want to talk about. More than once I have heard earnest entreaties by self-styled street ministers explaining "so-and-so, who begat he-who-hah, who married she-to-way, daughter of luv-luv-luv.." all as an exercise to PROVE that Jesus was a black man. The "appearance" of Jesus seems important to many now, but to none back then??