Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (16863)	3/31/2004 8:58:38 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

I don't, and would not commit the obvious error of denying that Mohammad was a real person who lived and made certain religious claims. The truth of his claims are something I would question. Jesus backed up His claims by rising from the dead. Mohammad denies the claims of Jesus and did not do anything that would cause me to believe his claims. Therefore I conclude Jesus has more credibility than Mohammad. "If you deny Mohammed then you will look very foolish indeed too , to 1bil people who do believe in this ." As I said, of course there is a difference between denying his existence as a historical person and denying that what he taught was true.