Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (177312)	3/31/2004 12:35:06 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: "There is no reason to pay these people like we do anymore. " I agree. Unfortunately, this ruling will not impact them. RE: "We have a staff glut, at every level including CEO." How many CEO's have successfully taken companies public? This is the shortage issue. Yesterday, I completely agreed BODs needed to pull back on the executive compensation. However, with these new potential rulings, BODs should keep an eye on China's exec comp packages and also watch if people move overseas, before we push back on executive compensation here. So far, the pay here is better, but there are some execs whom are obviously more attracted to China's handling of options. It's sad. This two-tier stuff isn't good for our country. edit: OTOH how many execs want to live in Sars-land and deal with IP theft? Hopefully we don't lose execs due to this ruling. They should make it international though, otherwise it'll put the USA at a huge disadvantage (yet again). Regards, Amy J