SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: T L Comiskey who wrote (40907)3/31/2004 9:08:02 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 89467
 
Dean at Yale
School of Forestry and Environmental Studies..
dumps on Little George

BUSHGREENWATCH
Tracking the Bush Administration's Environmental Misdeeds
bushgreenwatch.org
***************************************

March 31, 2004

ENVIRONMENTAL PIONEER DECRIES BUSH ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE

A major new book explains why global efforts have failed to curb
the world's most serious environmental threats -- and lays a
large share of the blame at the feet of the Bush Administration.

"I think the biggest problem we have in facing these issues is
the lack of U.S. leadership. In fact, what we've had is negative
leadership," said longtime environmental leader Gus Speth,
author of Red Sky at Morning. Now dean of the Yale School of
Forestry and Environmental Studies, Speth offers eight
approaches that can deter global environmental deterioration, as
well as an analysis of why most efforts thus far have failed.

One of the pioneers of the modern environmental movement, Speth
was co-founder of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC),
an environmental advisor to President Jimmy Carter, founder of
the environmental think tank World Resources Institute, and CEO
of the UN Development Programme.

Speth described to BushGreenwatch a pattern of obstructionist
policies throughout the Bush tenure that have impeded global
efforts to address pressing environmental issues such as climate
change, renewable energy development, fossil fuel emissions,
population measures and depletion of the ozone layer.

Rather than join with European nations to forge agreements on
how nations can reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, combat
global warming, thwart further depletion of the ozone layer or
reduce exposure to toxic chemicals, the Bush administration has
chosen policies that curry favor with industry, Speth said.

"I think they've been more concerned about their own future from
the outset," he said, "their own political future, rather than
the public's future and our country's future. In my judgment
this is really reprehensible."

Specifically, Speth criticized the Bush administration for:

-Backing out of the Kyoto Protocol to reduce man's contribution
to global climate change, and breaking "his own campaign
commitment to a bill that would have regulated carbon dioxide
emissions," a major contributor to global warming.
-Opposing multinational efforts to reach goals on renewable
energy development at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable
Development in Johannesburg, South Africa.
-Attempting to water down an international treaty to strictly
limit or eliminate exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants
(POPs) and "dragging its feet" on getting the treaty ratified.
-Opposing legislation put forward by Senators McCain and
Lieberman that would establish a federal goal to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
-Blocking support for international population program measures
because of pressure from the right to life movement.
-Seeking massive exemptions from a successful international
treaty to reduce production of methyl bromide (a potent
ozone-depleting chemical). This would reverse U.S. progress on
the problem, and has caused international anger.

Perhaps the most egregious acts of the Bush Administration have
been in the area of U.S. energy policy and the failure to
support the Kyoto Protocol, Speth said. Not only did the U.S.
pull out of this historic agreement to reduce carbon dioxide
emissions, but doing so has delayed Russian ratification, and
will likely deter European nations from participating in the
latter phases of the treaty, he said.

"This is huge in historic terms," said Speth. "We are rapidly
losing our chance to prevent extremely serious and costly
climate disruption. We haven't acted on this problem, and the
U.S. is the biggest culprit. If we don't tackle this problem now
we will reap very serious consequences."



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (40907)3/31/2004 9:11:30 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Sprott's Canada Stock Fund Favors Gold Bars, Cash: Taking Stock

March 31 (Bloomberg) -- Eric Sprott has transformed his Canadian Equity Fund, the best performer in Canada for the last five years, into what might be described as the Canadian Equity, Gold and Cash Fund.

Sprott, 59, is so bearish on the stock market that he won an exemption from an Ontario Securities Commission rule that prohibits mutual funds from holding more than 10 percent of assets in bullion.

The fund has 16 percent of its C$335 million ($256 million) of assets in gold bars, stored in bank vaults in Toronto. Another 27 percent is in cash.

Rising oil prices will crimp consumer spending and depress corporate earnings, ending a rally that's lifted the Standard & Poor's/TSX Composite Index by 35 percent in the past 12 months, in his view.

The fund owns shares of PetroKazakhstan Inc., an oil producer in Kazakhstan, and Thunder Energy Inc., a producer in western Canada. Sprott is opening a new fund in April that will focus on energy stocks.

``There's going to be some carnage,'' he said. ``That's what we're trying to protect against.''

The Sprott Canadian Equity Fund returned 44 percent annually for the past five years on average, trouncing the 6.8 percent return for the S&P/TSX. The performance is the best among 512 Canadian funds tracked by Bloomberg.

Oil and Gas

Along with the gold and cash, the fund has 28 percent of assets in mining stocks and 20 percent in oil and gas companies, said Sprott, overseeing the equivalent of $1.12 billion as chief executive officer of Sprott Asset Management Inc. in Toronto. Stock investments in other industries account for the rest.

``In a really bad market sell-off, all stocks go down,'' he said. ``There's less risk owning the metals than the stocks when things get bad, even though they don't give you the same upside.''

Sprott began in the investment business 33 years ago as an analyst at Merrill Lynch & Co., and later ran his own securities firm. He was a bull until 1999, when he decided that too many new shares of companies were being sold. He started buying gold and miners of the metal.

In October, his fund became the first to win an exemption from the securities commission that allows it to hold up to 20 percent of assets in gold bullion.

$500 Gold?

Gold has surged 64 percent since February 2001. The rise will continue because there's not enough supply from mines to meet demand from consumers such as jewelry makers, Sprott said.

The precious metal's price may climb to $500 an ounce this year as investors realize the stock-market rally in the past year is a break from the declines of 2001 and 2002, not the start of a new bull market, Sprott said.

Also, he cited the weekly ABC News/Money magazine consumer confidence index as evidence that there may be a recession ahead. The index slid 18 points in eight weeks from Jan. 26 to March 15.

There have been two recessions in the U.S. since the poll's inception in 1985: from July 1990 to March 1991, and from March 2001 to November 2001. The reading dropped 11 points in four weeks in 1989, and 14 points in nine weeks in 2001.

``It's not difficult to imagine why a consumer would be upset these days,'' Sprott said. ``You don't like what's happening to you on the geopolitical front, and you don't like what's happening when you go to the gas pumps or get your gas bill. The jobless recovery is an element of it too.''

Raising Cash

Sprott decided the market's losses may be so big that gold stocks wouldn't be sufficiently safe. He expects declines to be sharp enough that investors will sell shares without considering the companies' earnings prospects.

``When there's a steep decline, people tend to sell whatever they have to raise cash,'' he said.

He said he's not sure how long or steep any slide might be. He attributes part of his success to ignoring benchmark indexes such as the S&P/TSX, the yardstick against which most Canadian stock-fund managers are judged. The only index he watches is the American Stock Exchange's Gold Bugs Index, which tracks 15 gold- mining stocks traded in U.S. markets.

``We do a few things differently,'' he said. ``We don't look at the (S&P/TSX) index, and we seriously overweight things that we believe in.'' Producers of raw materials, including metals, account for 17 percent of the S&P/TSX's value. Energy shares account for 14 percent.

Hubbert's Theory

Sprott said he's starting the Sprott Energy Fund in part because crude-oil prices may surge another 69 percent, although he didn't say by when. Crude for May delivery closed at $36.14 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange yesterday.

``It's not going to surprise us to see oil at $50 or $60 a barrel,'' he said, citing a theory called Hubbert's Peak. The theory, as interpreted by some academics, argues that world oil production will reach a zenith next year and then decline. The projection is based on research by the late M. King Hubbert, a geophysicist for Shell Oil Co. who correctly forecast in 1956 that U.S. oil production would peak in 1970.

Higher energy costs mean less money for consumers to spend and increased cost of goods for companies. Sprott forecast that the effect may crimp earnings in all sectors.

The fund's holdings will include PetroKazakhstan and Cameco Corp., the world's largest producer of uranium used to generate nuclear power.

Sprott stands out in the money-management industry for his willingness to make outsized bets, according to investors such as Jim Hall, who helps oversee the equivalent of $990 million for Mawer Investment Management Inc. in Calgary.

``When he sees something, he's not afraid to ride it,'' said Hall, who knows Sprott from his days in the brokerage business. Such big bets aren't the norm because if the investments don't pan out, a fund can lag competitors, said Hall.

``There's a tremendous business risk in doing that,'' he said. ``A lot of people don't want to bear it. His clients probably understand that.''

Last Updated: March 31, 2004 00:06 EST



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (40907)3/31/2004 9:35:20 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Pure speculation....

Ashcroft is a man who excites deep passions in left wingnuts.... it could also have been that type of threat....