Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CNBC -- critique. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (13017)	4/1/2004 12:57:22 AM
From: laura_bush	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17683

Well, isn't THAT refreshingly funny? Buffet's a liberal. LMAO. Seems to rub you ALL WRONG, Rudi. He really "should be" a Repuglican, shouldn't he? What would you have him do besides off shore to China all of the jobs in the corporations he owns majority in? I'm sure that wouldn't nearly enough to satisfy you in your unquenchable quest to feel "superior" to all other "inferior" human beings in this country -- and world. As in, "Anybody who can't afford to shop at Talbot's doesn't deserve to live." Trashy people, those. With no CLASS. <snicker> "lb"

To: sandintoes who wrote (13017)	4/1/2004 3:35:24 PM
From: Mark Marcellus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17683

There now, does that make sense? Actually, no, at least based on that article. It's about building a pipeline to transport stranded Alaskan natural gas. It says nothing about either drilling or oil. For that matter, though I have no idea what Buffett's feelings are on drilling in ANWAR, I'm not sure what its relevance is to his supposed liberal purity. These things aren't monolithic. After all, there are conservatives who oppose the Bush tax cuts, but I don't think that means they are not really conservatives. Or, for that matter, I don't think Bush is a liberal because he's running a huge deficit. <g>