Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (128164)	4/2/2004 10:56:55 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<Uh, I think you just lumped the Iraq invasion into the war on terror. BTW what do the "" marks around war on terror in your post signify?> What the "marks" signify, as well as the remarks that precede them, is that the "war on terror" includes Iraq only in the partisan politics of the Bush administration. I do not lump these things together -- that lumping has been the spin coming out of the White House. Iraq is NOT part fo the real war on terror -- it is a dangerous and very costly distraction from the real war on terror. If the Bush Administration had not lumped Iraq in with the war on terror it would have far, far fewer critics, and far, far more allies around the world. Going after Iraq under the guise of the "war on terror" was BS from day one.