Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chas. who wrote (11482)	4/2/2004 12:45:34 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 81568

Ralph Nader would have invaded Afghanistan after 9-11. Afghanistan we all agree on, though we largely left before the job was finished because Bushies were obsessing on Iraq. The fact remains that there is more terrorism now than before 9-11 and we are stuck in Iraq with big bull's eyes on our backs. Iraq is also costing us hundreds of billions and is getting worse not better. June 30th looks like a very iffy date for handing over any power. Absent the WMD's argument, the Bush administration still has no clear excuse for invading Iraq and has certainly mired most of our resources there making us unable to fight terror in all the other places around the world. Kerry would make a much better leader on the war on terror because he'd be smart, realistic and use our allies as allies. For instance, where do we get 1000 Arab translators or CIA agents? We get them from our allies. And wouldn't it be nice to be sharing the load in Iraq with UN peacekeepers. Too late now though. Only Kerry can bring in our allies to help. They are not going to cooperate with Bush. They distrust all neocons because they have been lied to too many times.