SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Douglas who wrote (3452)4/2/2004 2:40:37 PM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
I don't think using state figures for calculating tax withholding (as referred to in the Bloomberg article you posted) is good methodology. Some states don't even have a state tax. The Treasury Dept number (the DTS that Haim posted) says it all, and I track it regularly. But to keep it simple just go to March 31st for this year and last, and you'll get a yoy. Look under "withheld income and employment taxes. For 2004 FY (since Oct. 1) it's 730,964 vs 722,298, up 1.2%. Of course take home pay has been higher , Biderman at Trim Tabs has been adding 4%. However that's over now, the effect of the yoy take home pay gains is history, especially now that about 80% of tax refunds have been sent out.

The DTS numbers for the period (Jan- March)that the men behind the curtain just gave us, actually look a tad worse than the 1.2%. So I can only conclude the same for these "job numbers" that I concluded for the ludicrous PPI number. So the Ministry of Propaganda is out in full force, and the "professionals" who invest the trillions of dollars based on these turds are utterly failing in their responsibility and duty. I don't know how much longer such deceit and perps can be carried on, but I suspect that when the curtain is pulled to reveal the Wizard of Oz, the conditions for a panic and permanent disillusionment will be in force. Somebody responsible might actually enter a bunch of sell tickets. The closest historical comparison to the current would be John Law's deception of the French people during the 1720 Mississippi Scheme.



To: Robert Douglas who wrote (3452)4/2/2004 2:51:18 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 116555
 
I do not confuse the two I wanted to show you the differences and I wrote yes to the household # I referred to.

As to the rest I see you were answered. It is not just "jobs" but about the quality of "jobs" - earning $18,000 to $20,000 a month as a care taker for the elderly is not like working in a productive job that pays $35,0000 to $40,0000