Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (186038)	4/5/2004 6:24:19 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1572788

I consider it an unAmerican act because it was not at all in the best interest of this country. Every policy or proposal ever made was considered by someone a bad idea that wasn't in the interest of this country. Many of them actually turned out not to be in the interest of this country (or whatever country implimented them). If that is the standard for un-American then I guess I would have to consider Bush un-American (even if my reasons might largely be different then yours), but I would also would probably have to consider every president in the history of the US to be un-American. And I noticed that one more time, you side stepped the debt issue. No not one more time because I didn't side step it either before or in that post. The debt, or in particular the spending which causes the need for the debt would fall under "Every president has weaknesses and bad policies." After saying a number of times that spending has gotten to high, that Bush has not exercised control over it and that the current debt levels are high I don't see how I could reasonably be accused of "sidestepping the debt issue". Tim