Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greg s who wrote (118299)	4/4/2004 5:42:10 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

Wrong. Company A produced autos that ran much better on standard tires than Company B's products. In addition, Company A's new cars could run on Community D's new super-high-mileage tires, and will run on Company C's version of the super-high mileage tires (available now in prototype form) when they ship. Company B still hasn't released an auto that runs on super-high-mileage tires, and it is now rumored that it will perform poorly on those tires when released. Doug

To: greg s who wrote (118299)	4/4/2004 5:47:45 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

"it's your silly analogy!" Something silly here...perhaps not the analogy that's silly...My original statement remains that AMD's revenues per share are $13.25 compared to INTC's $5.25 per share...AMD's Opteron is gaining marketshare in an previously INTC-only domain (i.e. good for AMD, bad for INTC)...AMD's flash division is rapidly moving into profitability, INTC's is mired in red and directionless... To conclude that AMD's 12 month price will decline and INTC's will increase in such an environment is preposterous, all the moreso, when published on the letterhead of a "prestigious-to-some-anyway" Wall St. firm! The firm should needs to be admonished for ever having let such a nonsensical report see the light of day beyond its premises!