SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (559991)4/5/2004 8:56:07 AM
From: Neenny  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
This letter to the editor sure is making it's way around. It was emailed to me from a friend in Atlanta yesterday. I was intrigued by it.

Just checked out the web site of the guy that sent the article to the paper, interesting.



To: Bill who wrote (559991)4/5/2004 5:17:48 PM
From: blue red  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
I wonder why you're addressing that post to me. I don't think I said Bush is the worst president in US history, even if I think that's likely - on more grounds than foreign policy. I certainly won't debate the history of warfare since 1941, even though the letter-writer has some weird ideas. I will comment on this:

President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban

Funny, the Iraqis don't feel liberated. Have you looked at the protesting crowds in the papers? Outside the Sunni Triangle, they're glad to be rid of Saddam, but most believe they've got a new yoke on their shoulders, the US occupation, and they don't like it. You know, you really can't call an occupied country "liberated." As for the Taliban, they and the warlords are resurgent in Afghanistan, the US having walked away in order to attack Iraq. But you're right that, according to reports, Al Qaeda is crippled. That doesn't matter much if a hundred Osama bin Ladens have been created in Iraq's wake, as Mubarak predicted. Terrorism has gone up, not down.