Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (560020)	4/5/2004 9:46:36 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

If a woman has the choice to kill her unborn child and it is not murder, then why are women in jail today for killing a two year old child? Let's give a woman the right to choose to kill her children at anytime. It's a matter of "choice" right? At 23 weeks it's ok to throw a baby in the trash can but at 25 weeks it isn't? Who dreamed that up? w-cpc.org There is right and wrong and legal and illegal. The further right and legal are separated, the closer to the end times we become. And that's "my" opinion. Steve

To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (560020)	4/5/2004 11:18:39 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Yes. I've tried to make the point that the law does not say anyone must have an abortion who feels (as does steve harris, who replied to your post with a clearly sectarian religious reference to "end times"), that their religious or ethical convictions requires them to gestate any fertilized ovum to term (assuming it isn't among the 50% of fertilized ova that nature aborts spontaneously). The law is to give certain choices to women and their physicians as opposed to the government.