SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Harvey Allen who wrote (41514)4/6/2004 11:52:04 AM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 89467
 
I brought up Kennedy yesterday in an admittedly provocative way. His recent charge that Iraq is "Bush's VietNam" ( canoe.ca ) was still reverberating as I read in your post

US-led forces in Afghanistan will move into Pakistani territory to destroy Taliban and other extremist groups if Islamabad cannot do the job by itself

Immediately, I had a deja vu flashback to Nixon and Cambodia ( americanrhetoric.com ). Some things are the same, and some different - history rhyming. Like Cambodia, I suspect an invasion of Pakistan will destabilize that country, and be looked back as a grave error. Unlike April of 1970, when Nixon made his announcement, there is no strong anti-war movement in this country now. The Cambodia decision led to demonstrations at places like Kent State. That, coupled with the flare-up at Jackson State in Mississippi, caused one of the largest eruptions of protest this country has ever seen. I recall watching Cronkite display a map of the US with the states colored that had had demonstrations that day. All were colored except the "spine" states in the middle of the country, from North Dakota down to Texas.

'Twould be nice to see a similar map announcing Bush's defeat come November. Reprehensibly, I also recall the election in '72.

lurqer