Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (283150)	4/6/2004 11:30:43 AM
From: Bid Buster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

LOL, novel is right...about a whole lot of nothing. You should have heard her novel about how high energy prices are dis-inflationary. -g-

To: Lucretius who wrote (283150)	4/6/2004 11:38:35 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

MD must never have done any boxing if she calls Laura Bush's mildly sarcastic remarks "punches." <G> YOurs Truly, Evander.

To: Lucretius who wrote (283150)	4/6/2004 12:04:26 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

what's your interest in this that you would waste so much time on something like that? a. because she believes people will think she's saying something intelligent if she writes as many words as possible b. because she and Dave are friends c. because, despite her effort to get you to believe elsewise, she has no life And then there's the ever popular "choice d.". All of the above.

To: Lucretius who wrote (283150)	4/6/2004 1:50:26 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

what you did was proceed to point me to your synopsis of events and ask me if i agree it was a set up... i read the links that you referenced and came to a different conclusion as to who threw the first punch. (if you recall i said to you i would change my mind if i saw that the first punch was thrown by admin dave according to you) in case you missed it.... he didn't... it's right here Message 19989688 if we really wanted to parse the words in that post we could go there, frankly i don't.....the progression of events is obvious from there and btw...just the mere fact that you characterized his conversation with "lb" as butting in shows your bias let's face it, it wasn't what he said during that conversation that provoked bdbtr, it was who was saying it oh and lastly... i guess according to you by your own assessment, here you are "butting in" to my statement to terry mahoney Message 19989570 i didn't consider that "butting in" anymore than i considered it butting by admin dave in during his conversation with "lb" on corporate governance perusing the thread i sure see a whole lot of "butting in" going on here, hopefully you are just as concerned about those buttinskis as you were admin dave <g3>