Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (128605)	4/7/2004 1:12:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 281500

And I agree completely that he has no realistic plan. That would put you in good company, IMO. I don't think we could BEG the UN to take over in Iraq on their terms if we paid them a trillion dollars. Then I guess we should just dissolve the UN since they obviously are not up to upholding their charter. What a joke that would be, a bunch of dictatorships overseeing an election for the benefit of the US. Ironic, isn't it? There will be no election in Iraq, should the US effort fail. There will be far more blood shed, and it won't be by American forces, but between rival Iraqis, acting as proxies for other neighboring states, vying to control the second largest oil reserves in the region. Hawk