Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (8754)	4/7/2004 11:13:55 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

I don't think Rice can defend Clinton's inaction.

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (8754)	4/7/2004 11:19:52 AM
From: WaveSeeker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Yeah, I'm sure you plan your vacations on whether or not troops are overseas. Or do you just stay at home?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (8754)	4/7/2004 11:41:39 AM
From: Kevin Rose	Respond to of 173976

Believe me, if vacation = inaction, then we want Bush on vacation more. The more he 'leads', the worse the situation in this country (and the world) becomes... I'm thinking maybe we do what companies do when they have an incompetent CEO but don't want to alarm the public: golden parachute and announce that he wants to spend more time with his family.

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (8754)	4/7/2004 11:41:58 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

The bombing of the mosque will likely raise the question: How best does the US evacuate its soldiers from Iraq? You see, the bombing of the mosque will mean even the moderate Shiites will now tilt against the US occupation. Clearly, the only happy Iraqis are the Kurds. Could it be possible that the US will use the military of the Kurds much like it did the Northern Alliance in order to gain control of Iraq's key cities? Is this what's to come? Or will the US leave Iraq unsettled? Having our soldiers stand out as sitting ducks is not a viable option. So one of the two above scenarios must play out, short of a complete and thorough US military occupation. But committing such large numbers of US troops would leave the US vulnerable to other areas of the world where Al Qaeda has become even more organized. Probably best to start making the bumper stickers now: STUPID BUSH!