Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (5870)	4/7/2004 10:47:18 PM
From: John Sladek	Respond to of 12465

Jeff, Since I don't know the motives of the people who seized the money, the principal of charity requires that I assume that these accounts were seized by mistake. Once the mistake was pointed out, however, the money should have been returned immediately. Past acrimony, combined with the failure to return the money, makes me wonder wether this really was a mistake (althought this is purely speculation on my part). Is there such a thing as a writ of repleven under CA law? Would it be appropriate in such a case? Regards, John Sladek