Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (9002)	4/8/2004 8:13:06 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 173976

Failure is failure, Ann. The Bush Admininistration had sufficient warning of impending trouble such that interceptor jets--you did ignore my point on this, didn't you?--should have been better positioned, prepared and organized to respond to a hijacking. Clinton didn't get the warning a month ahead of 9/11; Bush did. You do agree on this, don't you? I'd like you to please revisit the questions I originally asked you: >>>Can you explain, Ann, why it took so long for the US to get interceptor planes on 9/11? Why those planes that did move out were from far away locations rather than close proximity locations to New York and Washington? And why those planes flew at one third their speed capacity?<<< Regarding your interesting want to be bipartisan on this disaster, it seems to me that those in the Clinton Administration are admitting their mistakes; however, those in the Bush Administration are not admitting to anything at all. This, in itself, should personally give you pause with respect to how Bush handled 9/11.