Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeuspaul who wrote (128786)	4/9/2004 11:20:07 AM
From: KLP	Respond to of 281500

Bush was in 233 days, Clinton was in 8 YEARS. Bush's policy was being developed. Bush therefore was still using the Clinton policy until the new FP could be developed. Given the contentious election and chad counts, then that Jan 20th we had a new Adm, the Senate didn't confirm all the new appointments until late summer, we had a China crisis with them taking our plane and crew..........PLUS the fact that Bush left many of the Clinton apppointments and career people in place, for unity and continuity, until his own people could be appointed. With all of this, did you think that Bush should have done Clinton's work by firing a cruise missile or two to the tents and camels again?