Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (128816)	4/9/2004 1:48:14 PM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Respond to of 281500

" And in Bush's White House "... There is ample information in the public arena to explain why things were done this way.Bush runs the WH like he would have liked to run a successful corporation. By using the top down approach. In this approach ,all information flows upstream and all decisions are made at the highest executive level only.If no action is requested from the top, the minions just go about their bidness, and pass the buck upstairs when questioned or when things go wrong. This all works fine if you have an effective ,intelligent and engaged CEO ,but tends to go Deep South if the opposite is true, and even worse when the CEO is given bad INTEL and is being pushed around by those on the Board Of Directors with an alternate agenda other than that of the security of the country. That's what’s happened. Pure and simple. Time for management change....as America's falling global equity dwindles. Hey..maybe the SEC should be doing this investigation! LOL! KC