Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (38781)	4/10/2004 2:10:05 AM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 793782

I've been looking at the vote breakdown vis-a-vis the Electoral College. I know the Mass Media wants to talk about raw percentages but we both know that's horse puckey. The states that are up for grabs are states where the economy can make a tremendous difference, I agree. It doesn't matter, in the long run, whether Bush can deliver his "safe" states. If he can't, he's dead. But even if he can, he's still got to persuade some of the toss-ups.

To: LindyBill who wrote (38781)	4/10/2004 2:35:45 AM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793782

I agree with both of your and CB's points. But I also think that no politician or political party can afford to ignore the politicizing of the Commission. If the Clinton comments prove true, and not those of some incredibly bad joker/mimic, I think they eviscerate whatever credibility Clarke may have had and further guarantee an even handed report. As to Kerry's winning the election if the war goes badly... Well never say never, but if he can work his way from anti-war enlistee to Commander-in-Chief of a war time America, I swear I will quit! ...Whatever it is I'm doing. 0\|0