Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (9462)	4/10/2004 7:05:30 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Cheney-Bush more dangerous than Nixon for many reasons: giveaways to the rich and corporate interests, damaged alliances, environmental pollution, reckless wars we can't get out of, pork barrel spending we don't need, draining of SS and Medicare and the Treasury in general. Because JK can make America just as safe or safer from terrorism, why would anyone vote for Cheney-Bush?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (9462)	4/10/2004 7:43:30 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

<More likely, I think, Bush was so hell bent on invading Iraq that he convinced himself of a truth based on faulty evidence. That is a terrible sin. But not the same as deliberately misleading the country into the disaster that Iraq has become.> ______________________________ "convinced himself of a truth based on faulty evidence"..... What if he knew that evidence was faulty? would that still be lying? Didn't the CIA tell him a couple of times he was using faulty evidence from Niger in his state of the union speech and request that he not use it? Didn't he use it anyway? The following is very short and on topic. workingforchange.com