Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (42305)	4/12/2004 4:41:05 AM
From: lurqer	Respond to of 89467

Let me try to combine the responses to two posts into one. First your # 42303 post. You don't support these men. Wrong again. I seek to remove them from harm's way. You apparently don't. You congratulate yourself for attempting to portray them as baby killers Since I've expressed no happiness about this situation, I haven't been doing any congratulating. As for the "attempting", answer my question from the previous post: Do you believe that it is very likely that Americans have killed babies in Fallujah in their recent assault? This is exactly what they don't want from us. What they would like is for those at the top of the chain of command to be straight with them - for a change. You're a despicable fraudulent puke. Everyone is entitled to have an opinion. Given the quality of yours, from you, I'll take that as a compliment. Is the denial starting to crack? Now your post # 42305. There's two sides shooting in Fallujah. You figure it out. My mistake. Your denial is still strong. I'm not denying there is innocent suffering and that children are involved. What I'm denying is that you somehow "proved" anything. You didn't. You posted two pictures. You still don't know who was actually responsible. Let me see if I have this straight. I'll take your "I'm not denying there is innocent suffering and that children are involved." as the an affirmative answer to my question about have Americans have killed babies in Fallujah. If you are stipulating to that, I think your "still don't know who was actually responsible" is back to the likely question. re. I've said the opposite to you. No you haven't. "Enjoyment" is not the issue you addressed at all. This continuous misrepresentation of what you are actually saying is exactly why I'm calling it specious bs. Because it is. I see I have to spell things out for you. When I said Why do you think morale is low, and suicides are high?, I believe I was "strongly implying" that there was no enjoyment on the part of American troops in killing babies. I believe it's obvious where the bs is coming from. JMO lurqer

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (42305)	4/12/2004 5:11:48 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Easter Message to the Nation indicates CHRONIC BUSH FOOT-IN-MOUTH DISEASE: "Obviously, every day I pray there is less casualty..." -- Gee, Dubya news.yahoo.com. What a language-sacrificing Pascal Lamb. (Or maybe he's just a Leasters Bunny?)