Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: willcousa who wrote (177476)	4/13/2004 9:45:35 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: "And their stake in insuring that the US does not start treating them like they have treated us becomes so great that they are more amenable." -------------------------------- I see what you mean. But the motivation to play fair doesn't seem to exist for China possibly because they have a large market, or possibly the govt is unable to control its population from doing illegal things (you'd think a dictatorship style government is suppose to have good control on enforcement, but something is amiss.) In the case of a large market, it could mean the old rules are invalid and things may play out differently unless the USA govt is serious about protecting its IP and resolves imbalanced export taxation. Currently, the USA govt let's China steal IP in 600 cases of IP theft per year. Regards, Amy J