SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (563877)4/13/2004 1:06:43 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 769667
 
The Book on Ben-Veniste

Sept. 11 Commissioner Richard Ben-Veniste, who grilled Condoleezza Rice on Thursday as if she were a criminal suspect, is usually identified in press reports as merely a former Watergate prosecutor.

But as the leading finger-pointer in the 9/11 probe, a few other details in Ben-Veniste's background might be deemed relevant.

The Washington super-lawyer's last high-profile roll came in 1995-96, when he served as lead Democratic counsel for the Senate Whitewater hearings. His chief mission: Defending Bill and Hillary Clinton for all he was worth.

A review of press reports from the period shows that he'd been auditioning for the job since at least 1993, when he stepped up to the plate to assure reporters that there was nothing untoward about the Clintons dispatching White House counsel Bernard Nussbaum and other top aides to rifle Whitewater lawyer Vince Foster's office on the night of his death.

"Novelists aside and skeptical Washington journalists aside, I don't hear anything involved in this tragedy that leads me to suspect either Bernie Nussbaum, who himself has an impeccable reputation, or anybody else associated with the White House has done anything that is not on the up-and-up," Ben-Veniste told the Associated Press at the time.

The next year, when independent counsel Kenneth Starr was appointed to look into Whitewater, Dr. Rice's griller was troubled, telling CBS News that the move would "inevitably ... create an impression that this decision was in part politically motivated."

Of course, Nussbaum, Ben-Veniste and Hillary Clinton were by then already old friends, having worked shoulder-to-shoulder on the Watergate committee two decades earlier.

When the Clintons' fund-raiser extraordinaire Terry McAuliffe got into legal hot water in the campaign finance scandal of 1997, Ben-Veniste was ready to take his case.

Speaking of the allegations that swirled around his client at the time, Ben-Veniste told the Legal Times that McAuliffe "has been advised that he is not a target of any investigation. And on the basis of what I know about the matter ... the conclusion will be that there's nothing there."

The Clinton Justice Department decided that Ben-Veniste was right and McAuliffe was off the hook. Three years later, the Clintons installed Ben-Veniste's client as head of the DNC.

The Democratic legal ace's most unusual case by far, however, took place not in Washington - but in Arkansas.

Ben-Veniste's client, a flamboyant pilot named Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal, was said to have flown guns out of Arkansas' Mena airport at the CIA's direction. On the return trip his plane was allegedly loaded with cocaine.

Still, the high-powered lawyering didn't do much to protect Seal. Ben-Veniste's client was assassinated in 1986 after he began cooperating with a federal probe into the Mena drug ring that flourished while Bill Clinton was governor of the state.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (563877)4/13/2004 1:06:58 PM
From: goldworldnet  Respond to of 769667
 
Maybe Ben-Veniste needs to avoid the cameras the next time he tries to browbeat somebody.

* * *



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (563877)4/13/2004 1:11:08 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 769667
 
Ben-Veniste looks and acts like Al Franken.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (563877)4/13/2004 1:13:13 PM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The Final Meltdown

David Sessions

April 13, 2004

In my one of my most-published columns last year, I wrote about how the Democrats had been purchased by George Soros. How their seething hatred of President Bush and their shameless grab for power had left them on the wrong side of history and out of step with America. Well, I have an update. This trend has not only continued since then, but has intensified. With the events of the past few weeks involving Richard Clarke, the 9/11 Commission, and Ted Kennedy, we are seeing a monumentous moment in the history of American politics: the final meltdown of the Democrats. They are blind to the fact that it is happening, and if things continue on the present course, reality will not strike until early this November.

The meltdown has not been brought about by the superior political tactics of the Republican party, by "attack" ads, or by President Bush. It is the sole work of the Democrats themselves. Their opposition to the war in Iraq has morphed from being conscientious objectors (which I have doubts that they ever were) to the most disgusting politicization of war in our history. In the last few months, it has come out that John Kerry, Howard Dean, Wesley Clark, and Bob Kerrey (a former senator on the 9/11 commission) all advised the disarmament of Saddam Hussein at some point in the past two years. Suddenly, as we turned the corner into an election year, they have become the most militant opposition to the Bush administration's liberation of Iraq. What does this about-face say about them? While I will not say they care nothing about America's security, it is definately second to getting power back from Bush.

After saying that Bush "concocted a war for political gain" and told us "lie after lie after lie", Senator Ted Kennedy is back with more patriotic wartime comments. His latest message to us and our soldiers is that "Iraq is George Bush's Vietnam, and this country needs a new president". Nice thing to know when you're on the front lines. Real nice thing to know when you're a Saddam loyalist trying to undermine America's morale in abolishing violence in Iraq. But Kennedy isn't the only one mentioning Vietnam in comparison to Iraq. Other senators have, as well as the Big Man, himself, John Kerry, who told NPR he hasn't seen "such arrogance in foreign policy since Vietnam". Never mind that Vietnam is the only war America didn't win, and Iraq is the most successful one in history. Yeah, they're the same all right.

While the Vietnam comparisons are reprehensible enough, they're not the ugliest behavior of the Democrat party lately. The 9/11 Circus--oops, I mean Commission--is the most visible and transparent face of the Left's meltdown. They are, day after day, revealing their true colors to America. This was never more obvious than last Thursday, when Democrat Commissioners made a joke of the hearings by trying to play "gotcha" with Condoleeza Rice. Bob Kerrey lectured her for two solid minutes before beginning his questions on how bad the Iraq war is going, then whined "It's not fair! It's not fair!" that Rice's answers were cutting into his time. He dripped with arrogance when he said he would "disabuse" her of using a phrase he didn't like, and cut an answer off to say "But you're figuring this out. You've got to give a very long answer!" Kerrey probably thought he'd look like a smart, though questioner. Instead, he looked like an angry, partisan buffoon. Which, by the way, he was.

Kerrey wasn't the only Commissioner who disclosed the partisan politics of the Beat-Bush Hearings. Commissioners Ben-Veniste, Gorelick, and Roemer also peppered Rice questions aimed to trap her and shame the Bush administration. The network news, New York Times, and Washington Post jumped aboard the following day to hail their "tough questions" and tell us how badly Condi Rice failed to make the administration's case. They, along with the Democrats, seem to be oblivious to the fact that we watched. We saw. We know what happened, and it's becoming increasingly apparent that they in the media aren't telling us the truth. It is also apparent who is interested in national security, and who's interested in getting their party back in power.

This is the reason is why the Democrats are in their last days. They will be shocked when Bush wins confortably in November, saying "We stopped at nothing to see that this didn't happen. How in the world did it?" It will have happened because Americans have an uncanny way of seeing through the smoke of political battles. Despite the media's potrayal of a nation equally divided, America knows that 9/11 was Al-Quaeda's fault, not President Bush's. We know that Iraq is not Vietnam. We know that taking out Saddam and the Taliban were the best things we could have done. We know that our President acted on his conscience, not out of compellation by special interests.

The Democrats, in their quest for glory and power, have become the naked emperor parading down the street. They are the only ones who don't know it.

opinioneditorials.com