SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lurqer who wrote (42584)4/13/2004 9:42:56 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
3 different questions about a mistake or an apology or his biggest failure, and he was speechless. Not a thing. NADA! Experts who would study this news conference would all agree that he is one lying criminal clueless dumb dangerous egocentric SOB POS in charge of the most dangerous military machine the world has ever seen. God help us all cause we have a very dangerous mad man at the wheel with a messiah complex!



To: lurqer who wrote (42584)4/13/2004 10:07:40 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Bush ready to send more troops to Iraq

President vows to finish job as
stand-off with Shias increases tension


Rory McCarthy

President George Bush last night declared he was ready to send more US troops to Iraq "to finish the work of the fallen" in accomplishing the transition to democratic self-rule.
In a rare prime-time televised news conference that opened with a 15-minute address to the nation, Mr Bush conceded the US had suffered some "tough weeks" in Iraq but rejected comparisons with the Vietnam war.

"I happen to think that analogy is false," the president said, adding that it sent "the wrong message" to US forces and to Iraqis.

As more than 2,000 US troops amassed on the outskirts of the holy city of Najaf, threatening a showdown with the radical Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, Mr Bush said most Iraqis were against the recent uprising.

"It's not a civil war. It's not a popular uprising," he said. "They want to run us out of Iraq and destroy the democratic hopes of the Iraqi people".

His words came amid a crisis of confidence within Iraq as violence and kidnappings prompted several countries to urge their citizens to leave the country immediately, and several companies involved in the reconstruction to announce they were pulling out.

There was also sporadic gunfire in Falluja, the restive city west of Baghdad where dozens of US troops and hundreds of Iraqis have died this month.

And four mutilated bodies, possibly those of American contractors, were discovered in the Iraqi mayhem, according to a US official.

The coalition confirmed that 40 civilians from a dozen countries were being held hostage by kidnappers. Russia, France and the Czech Repub lic all advised their nationals to leave Iraq, as three Czechs remained missing and a French journalist joined the list of hostages.

"We will finish the work of the fallen," President Bush vowed. "Troop strength will be determined by the situation on the ground. If additional troops are needed, I will send them."

He said the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, and the defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld were negotiating with Nato foreign ministers over expanding the alliance's role in Iraq, "such as turning the Polish-led division into a Nato operation and giving Nato specific responsibilities for border control".

The stand-off between US forces and those loyal to Mr Sadr appeared to be reaching a head, with the dispatch of US units to within 10 miles of the cleric's fief in Najaf. Soldiers had set up checkpoints on roads and were preventing militia gunmen from leaving.

Mr Bush said Mr Sadr had to disband the militia units which have run amok in recent days. The Shia cleric, whom America has vowed to take dead or alive, said earlier he was prepared to die for his cause. But he also indicated he was prepared to negotiate a way to a resolution.

"I am ready to sacrifice [myself] and I call on the people not to allow my death to cause the collapse of the fight for freedom and an end to the occupation," he said in an interview with Lebanon's al-Manar television, which is run

by the Shia party Hizbullah.
But he also said his main aim was merely to keep foreign troops out of Najaf.

Appointing a mediator to negotiate with US forces, he indicated he might disband his militia if so instructed by religious chiefs. "My only demand for the time being is the liberation of Najaf and the withdrawal of occupation forces from it," he added.

Even if the US military is ready to agree to keep troops outside Najaf, commanders will continue to press for the disbanding of his militia and the arrest of Mr Sadr. He is wanted on suspicion of involvement in the murder a year ago of a moderate Shia cleric in Najaf.

Earlier in the day, the Shia rebellion appeared to be retreating. Mr Sadr's militia began to withdraw from police stations and government buildings in Najaf, Kufa and Kerbala - three religious cities in the south where they had been in control.

But the US move to arrest a top aide to Mr Sadr, Hazem al-Araji, rapidly aggravated tensions.

Mr Araji, who represents the movement in Kadhimiya, a Shia suburb in north Baghdad, was held as he tried to leave a Baghdad hotel. He was held for five hours before being released.

The episode was filmed and broadcast by several television channels. "The Americans are barbarians. They don't know how to deal with human beings," said Sheikh Mohsin Shamari who witnessed the episode. "They had no explanation for what they were doing."

Last night, Brigadier Gen eral Mark Kimmitt, US deputy director of operations in Iraq, said the cleric had been detained for questioning.

He was then found to have "no direct involvement in any alleged crimes and is not viewed as an imminent threat to security", he said.

The recent uprising has raised questions about the political timetable for handing sovereignty back to Iraq on June 30, but Mr Bush vowed to stick to the programme.

"We have set a deadline of June 30th it is important that we meet that deadline," he said. "Iraqis do not support an indefinite occupation and neither does America. We are not an imperial power, as nations such as Germany and Japan can attest. We are a liberating power."

Earlier, in an apparent sign of the pressure being felt within America about the way the situation is unfolding, US military officials announced that the surviving sisters of a female soldier killed in Iraq will not be compelled to return to the battlefield.

The family of Michelle Witmer, 20, who died on April 9 in an ambush of her Humvee in Baghdad, had pleaded for their daughters to be brought home.

The case attracted prominent political support.

guardian.co.uk

lurqer



To: lurqer who wrote (42584)4/13/2004 10:33:12 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Transcript Bush's speech:

President Bush: Good evening.

Before I take your questions, let me speak with the American people about the situation in Iraq.

This has been tough weeks in that country. Coalition forces have encountered serious violence in some areas of Iraq. Our military commanders report that this violence is being instigated by three groups. Some remnants of Saddam Hussein's regime, along with Islamic militants, have attacked coalition forces in the city of Fallujah. Terrorists from other countries have infiltrated Iraq to incite and organize attacks.

In the south of Iraq, coalition forces face riots and attacks that are being incited by a radical cleric named al-Sadr. He has assembled some of his supporters into an illegal militia and publicly supported the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah.

Al-Sadr's methods of violence and intimidation are widely repudiated by other Iraqi Shia. He's been indicted by Iraqi authorities for the murder of a prominent Shia cleric.

Although these instigations of violence come from different factions, they share common goals. They want to run us out of Iraq and destroy the democratic hopes of the Iraqi people.

The violence we have seen is a power grab by these extreme and ruthless elements. It's not a civil war. It's not a popular uprising. Most of Iraq is relatively stable. Most Iraqis by far reject violence and oppose dictatorship.

In forums where Iraqis have met to discuss their political future, and in all the proceedings of the Iraqi Governing Council, Iraqis have expressed clear commitments. They want strong protections for individual rights. They want their independence. And they want their freedom.

America's commitment to freedom in Iraq is consistent with our ideals and required by our interests. Iraq will either be a peaceful, democratic country or it will again be a source of violence, a haven for terror and a threat to America and to the world.

By helping secure a free Iraq, Americans serving in that country are protecting their fellow citizens. Our nation is grateful to them all and to their families that face hardship and long separation.

This weekend, at a Fort Hood hospital, I presented a Purple Heart to some of our wounded, had the honor of thanking them on behalf of all Americans.

Other men and women have paid an even greater cost. Our nation honors the memory of those who have been killed, and we pray that their families will find God's comfort in the midst of their grief.

As I have said to those who have lost loved ones, we will finish the work of the fallen.

America's armed forces are performing brilliantly, with all the skill and honor we expect of them. We're constantly reviewing their needs. Troop strength now and in the future is determined by the situation on the ground. If additional forces are needed, I will send them. If additional resources are needed, we will provide them.

The people of our country are united behind our men and women in uniform, and this government will do all that is necessary to assure the success of their historic mission.

One central commitment of that mission is the transfer of the sovereignty back to the Iraqi people. We have set a deadline of June 30th. It is important that we meet that deadline.

As a proud, independent people, Iraqis do not support an indefinite occupation, and neither does America. We're not an imperial power, as nations such as Japan and Germany can attest. We're a liberating power, as nations in Europe and Asia can attest as well.

America's objective in Iraq is limited, and it is firm. We seek an independent, free and secure Iraq.

Were the coalition to step back from the June 30th pledge, many Iraqis would question our intentions and feel their hopes betrayed. And those in Iraq who trade in hatred and conspiracy theories would find a larger audience and gain a stronger hand.

We will not step back from our pledge. On June 30th, Iraqi sovereignty will be placed in Iraqi hands.

Sovereignty involves more than a date and a ceremony. It requires Iraqis to assume responsibility for their own future.

Iraqi authorities are now confronting the security challenge of the last several weeks.

In Fallujah, coalition forces have suspended offensive operations, allowing members of the Iraqi Governing Council and local leaders to work on the restoration of central authority in that city. These leaders are communicating with the insurgents to ensure an orderly turnover of that city to Iraqi forces, so that the resumption of military action does not become necessary.

They are also insisting that those who killed and mutilated four American contract workers be handed over for trial and punishment.

In addition, members of the Governing Council are seeking to resolve the situation in the south. Al-Sadr must answer the charges against him and disband his illegal militia.

Our coalition is standing with responsible Iraqi leaders as they establish growing authority in their country. The transition to sovereignty requires that we demonstrate confidence in Iraqis. And we have that confidence. Many Iraqi leaders are showing great personal courage, and their example will bring out the same quality in others.

The transition to sovereignty also requires an atmosphere of security, and our coalition is working to provide that security.

We will continue taking the greatest care to prevent harm to innocent civilians, yet we will not permit the spread of chaos and violence. I have directed our military commanders to make every preparation to use decisive force if necessary to maintain order and to protect our troops.

The nation of Iraq is moving toward self-rule, and Iraqis and Americans will see evidence in the months to come. On June 30th, when the flag of a free Iraq is raised, Iraqi officials will assume full responsibility for the ministries of government. On that day, the transitional administrative law, including a bill of rights that is unprecedented in the Arab world, will take full effect.

The United States and all the nations of our coalition will establish normal diplomatic relations with the Iraqi government. An American embassy will open, and an American ambassador will be posted.

According to the schedule already approved by the Governing Council, Iraq will hold elections for a national assembly no later than next January. That assembly will draft a new permanent constitution, which will be presented to the Iraqi people in a national referendum held in October of next year.

Iraqis will then elect a permanent government by December 15, 2005 -- an event that will mark the completion of Iraq's transition from dictatorship to freedom.

Other nations and international institutions are stepping up to their responsibilities in building a free and secure Iraq. We're working closely with the United Nations envoy, Lakhdar Brahimi, and with Iraqis to determine the exact form of the government that will receive sovereignty on June 30th.

The United Nations Election Assistance Team, headed by Karina Perelli, is in Iraq developing plans for next January's election. NATO is providing support for the Polish-led, multinational division in Iraq. And 17 of NATO's 26 members are contributing forces to maintain security.

Secretary of State Powell and Secretary of State Rumsfeld and a number of NATO defense and foreign ministers are exploring a more formal role for NATO, such as turning the Polish-led division into a NATO operation and giving NATO specific responsibilities for border control.

Iraqis' neighbors also have responsibilities to make their region more stable. So I'm sending Deputy Secretary of State Armitage to the Middle East to discuss with these nations our common interest in a free and independent Iraq, and how they can help achieve this goal.

As we've made clear all along, our commitment to the success and security of Iraq will not end on June 30th. On July 1st and beyond, our reconstruction assistance will continue and our military commitment will continue.

Having helped Iraqis establish a new government, coalition military forces will help Iraqis to protect their government from external aggression and internal subversion.

The success of free government in Iraq is vital for many reasons:

A free Iraq is vital because 25 million Iraqis have as much right to live in freedom as we do.

A free Iraq will stand as an example to reformers across the Middle East.

A free Iraq will show that America is on the side of Muslims who wish to live in peace, as we've already shown in Kuwait and Kosovo, Bosnia and Afghanistan.

A free Iraq will confirm to a watching

blah,blah, etc.,lies, blah - the rest here: chron.com