Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (1878)	4/14/2004 12:30:55 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35834

So you are saying that Rich Lowry's article is all bunk? FWIW, I saw the interview too. Alan Colmes another liberal both were rudely interrupting Lowry in attack mode, asking specifically about one point, not the entire article. It was just another example of a typical liberal response when they can't debate the issue - attack the messenger - ridicule some small point of contention - dismiss the rest with sweeping generalities or completely ignore the preponderance of facts that are contrary to their POV. And Clarke is not a conservative, not even close. He's a partisan hack, voted for Gore in 2000 & his only known political contributions went to liberal democrats. I think that for the most part, Rich Lowry's article hit the nail right on the head. The liberal left is so wrapped up in their zeal to retake the White House that they are willing to say almost anything to get it. And that includes placing our national security at risk. You may feel free to dismiss the entire article over one debatable point of contention if that suits your bias. It won't however, change reality.