Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (129267)	4/15/2004 9:29:09 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I stick with what i said back then. Remember you had us losing the war and seem to have always rooted for that outcome or am i confusing you with someone else. Carl, Do you have a job or just dog posters with their own words in one of thousands of posts they made? A united American front would have benefited our effort once the war began. And sistani doesn't have to talk us in order to be a key (or the key) figure. And the fact that the bush team has handled the post war iraq situation not as well as expected, is no reason not to try to be creative in finding a solution. "Backing down now may be the beginning of the end for the free, democratic, pluralistic world." I stand by that so a solution whether tri state or sistani led is far more desirable than either fighting this war forever or surrendering to OBL and the boys. And yes some folks in the Bush admin need to be fired and if Kerry turns out to be strong on iraq, i will consider firing the president who has been somewhat of a disappointment to me in running the post war situation and/or not firing some of the folks who messed up whether it be in defense, fbi, cia etc. mike