SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 12:15:40 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
IMF says China overheating
Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:38:41 AM

WASHINGTON (AFX) - The Chinese economy appears to be overheating, and it is unclear whether the authorities have it under control or whether a flexible yuan would help immediately, the IMF said

"There are some signs of overheating," International Monetary Fund chief economist Raghuram Rajan said

"There is a tremendous amount of investment that is going on, credit has expanded tremendously and the Chinese authorities are trying to control this," he told reporters by telephone

"The jury is still out on whether they have brought it under control." The Chinese economy is estimated to have grown 9.5 pct in the first quarter of 2004 and may pick up further in the second to 10 pct, a Chinese official said in Beijing this week

It was uncertain whether exchange rate flexibility would help to chill the economy, Rajan said

The Chinese authorities faced a major obstacle reining in credit allocations by banks and bank branches

"Whether more limited exchange intervention will help solve that problem I think is an open question." In the long run, a flexible yuan would be important for China, however, enriching the country by letting prices reflect reality, fuelling Chinese consumption and lowering the cost of imports

"In the shorter run, there are a number of concerns that the Chinese have that have to be taken into account. That said, I think the Fund policy is that any move towards exchange rate flexibility would be a good thing," Rajan said

China's foreign reserves soared by a record 40.7 pct last year to 403 bln usd as it snapped up mostly US treasury bonds to protect a peg tying the yuan at 8.28 to the dollar

American exporters complain the yuan is undervalued, pricing US goods out of the Chinese market and depressing the cost of China-made goods sold in the US

But Rajan said too much blame was put on China for the US current account deficit

The US current account deficit exploded to a record 541.8 bln usd in 2003, stoked by a voracious US appetite for foreign-made goods

Latest US figures Wednesday showed the US trade deficit with China alone narrowed by 27.8 pct to 8.3 bln usd in February, well below the monthly record of 13.6 bln set last October

In fact, many goods imported from China had been diverted from other Asian countries only to be finished in China, Rajan said

"I think there is excessive blame put on China. That said, I think if the Chinese show some flexibility (on exchange rates) it will lead the way for other Asian economies to show some flexibility and will have some overall impact on the US current account deficit."

fxstreet.com



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 12:21:39 AM
From: gregor_us  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
What Next for Oil, Oil Stocks, Emerging Mkt Oil Stocks?

Everyone is griping that the oil stocks have lagged the market in the bull run, and everyone agrees that demand is only going higher, and no one truly believes there really is some sort of secret supply upturn that is really going to meet global demand...

Meanwhile, the emerging market oils like PetroBras, Tatneft, and Statoil remain undervalued and seriously so--and all the Futures and many of the Options indicate--continue to indicate--dim views about petroleum prices over the next 2-6 years.

On top of all this we've got a nice little inflation panic here that one would think would make the sector robust.

I grant the Oil Service proxy OIH already had a big move, though.

I'm getting the impression even the veterans are clueless about what happens next.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 12:25:19 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Jobless claims seen ticking higher
Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:52:23 PM

WASHINGTON (AFX) -- Continued job growth is the key to how fast and how much the Federal Reserve raises interest rates. One month of strong payroll growth won't be enough to try the Fed's patience, but a couple of months could, economists say. Although inflation rates seem to have come off their dangerously low levels, there's still plenty of slack in the economy that has to be worked off before inflation can really take off, they say

"Put simply, without reinforcement from rising labor costs, inflation is unlikely to rise materially on a sustained basis," said Ed McKelvey, an economist for Goldman Sachs, which is sticking by its forecast that the Fed won't raise rates until next year

The weekly jobless claims data to be released Thursday at 8:30 a.m. Eastern could provide some early clues about April's nonfarm payrolls and the unemployment rate. The claims data cover job losses, not job gains, so the complete picture won't be known until monthly figures are released May 7, just after the next meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee

[I doubt the FED will change bias without another month of data. I also think they will change bias before they hike. That might put August as the first possible place to hike if this analysis is correct - we might get a better feel for this on Friday when Greenspan speaks - mish]

According to the CBS MarketWatch survey, Wall Street economists expect the four-week average of new claims to rise slightly to about 337,250 from 336,750 as the number of claims in the April 10 week bounces higher from last week's four-year low of 328,000

"We look for initial unemployment claims to rise 8,000 in the week of April 10, to 336,000, in line with the trend over the last four weeks," said John Ryding, chief market economist for Bear Stearns. The weekly number is notoriously noisy. "Easter can temporarily distort the data: we expect a jump to 340,000 from 328,000," said Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist for High Frequency Economics

[All in all I guess I would rater the expectations be on the other side, but with treasuries this oversold, anything but strong employment would likely cause some rally in treasuries - mish]

Steve Stanley, chief economist for RBS Greenwich, thinks claims are heading lower. "Further declines in the number of new filers going forward will bode well for continued robust job growth in the coming months," Stanley said. "In any case, initial unemployment claims may have inched down further to around 325,000." Initial claims at these levels have been associated with monthly payroll gains "well in excess of 100,000," Stanley said. The first glimpses of April industrial activity will also be on display Thursday. The New York Fed will release its Empire State survey at 8:30 a.m. while the Philadelphia Fed reports at noon

"For both the New York and Philadelphia surveys, the most likely result is a modest uptick following sharp setbacks in the preceding month," McKelvey said. "This would still imply quite a bit less momentum than was evident as recently as January." Economists expect the Empire State index to rise to 27.5 from 25.3 (positive readings denote growth), while the Philly Fed index is expected to rise to 25.9 from 24.2

As always, traders will also be looking at the employment and prices paid indexes closely

fxstreet.com



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 7:20:02 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
<May 05 is at 116.20, and March 06 at 105.75>

Good points, a reverse contango, where you get paid interest just to wait. And I don't expect the supply side of the equation to be resolved by May, 2005, and even May, 2006 is very problematic. The demand side would require a worldwide contraction of 5-10% from today's levels, which I think could be a distinct possibility if China busts in my Train Wreck scenario. Therefore, one outcome might be for there to be a huge spike in the nearbys, with the longer dates lagging. A good compromise therefore might be the Dec. 2004, which trades 8 cents less than the nearby.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 8:38:39 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Empire State manufacturing index up sharply in April
By Greg Robb
WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- Manufacturing activity in the New York area improved significantly in April, the New York Federal Reserve Bank said Thursday. The bank's Empire State Manufacturing index rose to 36.1 in April from 25.3 in March. This is just slightly below the record high 42.1 reached in February. Readings over zero indicate expansion. The gain in the index was much stronger than expected. Economists were expecting the index to rise slightly to about 27.5 in April. The new orders index rose to 31.6 in April from 23.5 in March, while shipments rose to 41.6 from 26.3. The employment index jumped to 19.8 in April from 9.7 while the workweek index rose to 22.2 from 11.9. The prices paid index rose to a record high 56.2 from 50.0 in the previous month.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 8:48:03 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
U.S. jobless claims highest in a month

WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) - U.S. weekly jobless claims rose to their highest level in a month in the weeks ending April 10, the Labor Department said Thursday. The seasonally adjusted four-week average of first-time filings for state unemployment benefits rose by 6,750 to 344,250, the highest level since March 6. Wall Street economists expected a slight increase in filings. Initial claims in the most recent week jumped by 30,000 to 360,000, the highest since early February. The data in the first week of April are particularly difficult to seasonally adjust, a Labor Department official said.

[OK - I give up, why is April hard to seasonally adjust?
is 30,000 a "slight" increase? - mish]

Meanwhile, the number of workers receiving state benefits fell below 3 million for the first time since the summer of 2001. Continuing claims dropped 22,000 to 2.98 million.

[Are continuing claims falling because benefits are running out? - mish]



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 9:23:12 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
Snow Unconcerned about Inflation
Snow says US economy has much leeway for non-inflationary growth
Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:06:01 PM

US Treasury Secretary John Snow said he is "not particularly concerned" by the current level of inflation

Speaking on CNBC, Snow said the US economy still has "lots of latitude to grow and develop in a non-inflationary manner." He declined to make any comment on a possible interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve following recent signs that inflation is picking up in the US

He said yesterday's inflation figures showed a moderate increase in prices, and pointed out that inflation rates are at their lowest for 40-45 years

The Labor Department revealed a 0.5 pct CPI rise in March yesterday, with the core rate up 0.4 pct, compared with consensus forecasts for a 0.3 pct rise and for a rise in the core rate of 0.2 pct

Snow added that manufacturers still have surplus capacity, with a good deal of competitiveness, which means few companies have room to manoeuvre when it comes to price increases



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 10:33:40 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
Asia Pacific: Today's Inflation May Cause Tomorrow's Deflation

Andy Xie (Hong Kong)

Today’s inflation is based on borrowed money that supports consumption in the US and investment in China via its impact on commodity prices. This situation cannot last because labor surplus kills inflation expectations. When the cycle turns down, demand can be expected to bottom lower than normal under a higher debt burden, while capacity would be higher than normal. This combination would lead to deflation.

The central banks may raise interest rates against cost-push induced inflation. This would be the right action for the wrong reason. Low interest rates have led to debt-induced bubbles that will worsen deflationary pressure later. The right reason for tightening monetary policy would be to contain asset bubbles in order to prevent future deflation.

What Is Causing Inflation?

Headline inflation data are picking up, raising fears that the global economy could enter a period of high inflation. This is an erroneous conclusion, in my view. The current inflation stems from rising commodity prices caused by property speculation, mainly in the United States and China, that spills over into consumption in the US and investment in China. The pass-through to consumers of higher raw material costs in production is much less than usual, due to the overall surplus situation. Because wages are not linked to inflation in the current environment, the inflation mostly redistributes income from households to producers and from downstream to upstream producers.

Many analysts point to loose Fed policy as the reason for inflationary pressure. The source is correct but the mechanism is quite different. Loose monetary policy normally causes inflation due to, as Milton Friedman put it best, too much money chasing too few goods. However, broadly speaking, this is not what is occurring. Because globalization and new technologies have greatly lifted global output potential, i.e., there is a big global output gap, monetary policy currently has much less impact on inflation expectations.

Instead, cheap money causes speculation in asset markets. In a global economy where potential supply is greater than demand, the equilibrium inflation rate should be low. Hence, nominal income growth should also be low even though real income growth would be high. Further, the income growth would shift disproportionately to low-cost producers. Hence, rich households face low income growth in today’s world. But as money becomes cheap, the rich households expect assets to appreciate, which would be logical if their income growth potential had not changed. This “money illusion” – cheap money with income potential unchanged – is causing rich households to speculate. This is what is occurring in many Western economies.

The Fed’s cheap money policy has made money available for China’s high growth economy. The combination has caused even greater property speculation in China. The expectation that Shanghai’s property prices would converge towards those of Hong Kong and Taiwan was the catalyst for China’s property bubble. The low US interest rate prompted Hong Kong and Taiwan speculators to jump on this ‘convergence’ trade. As Shanghai’s property prices have risen and the revenue to the government has enabled the city to grow rapidly, other cities have emulated the trend, causing a nationwide property bubble.

Why is this type of inflation different? Under normal circumstances, when a central bank prints too much money, everyone expects prices to rise and, hence, asks for a wage increase. The economy experiences a price-wage spiral, and the leverage in the economy’s debt-to-GDP ratio does not rise. The current type of inflation comes from the spillover of demand from property speculation funded by debt. The indirect nature means that debt rises much faster than GDP.

In the last three years, the ratio of net borrowing by the financial sector to GDP increase in the US was 3.6 compared with 1.8 in the 1990s, 2.3 in the 1980s, 1.5 in the 1970s, and 1.6 in the 1960s. In the past three years, every dollar increase in China’s GDP was accompanied by a US$2.50 increase in domestic credit compared to US$1.60 in the 1990s.

Smaller Impact of Commodity Prices on Inflation

Under normal circumstances, loose monetary policy causes commodity prices to rise in a wage-price spiral; commodity producers ask for more money because they expect production costs to rise. When looser monetary policy works through property speculation to increase demand, commodity prices rise because demand is greater than expected. It is much more difficult to pass through higher commodity costs in production to customers in such an environment.

Historical patterns would suggest 4% inflation in OECD economies at this point in the commodity cycle. But we are only observing about 1%. The same disconnect is happening in East Asia ex-Japan. If we use the early 1990s as a comparator, the inflation rate in the region should be 8-10% at this point in the cycle. But we are only observing about 3% based on the official data and 5% if we assume that China’s data understate inflation now.

Debt Deflation May Not Be Far Away

The global economy has experienced a positive capacity shock through globalization. The need to find an equilibrium should have caused a downward price level adjustment in the developed economies. Instead, monetary authorities, mainly the Fed, are using cheap money to fight this adjustment, causing a massive property bubble that creates superficial demand and stops prices from declining. However, as soon as the bubble bursts, the world will need a bigger downward adjustment because of the extra capacity formed during the bubble.

Most importantly, so much debt has been created that it may lead to debt deflation. Globalization would have caused benign deflation that benefits consumers and causes some industries to relocate to lower-cost locations. But fighting against this sort of deflation with bubbles and debts must lead to deflation. In my view, this is what happened in the 1920s after World War I.


When the global property bubble bursts, debt deflation could ensue. It is always possible that the Fed could create another bubble to postpone the inevitable. For example, direct purchase of US Treasuries to push the 10-year yield down to 2% could create another property bubble. However, the Fed may repent and Mr. Greenspan could retire. It may not be profitable to bet on the next bubble.

morganstanley.com



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 10:51:41 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
U.S. mortgage rates up again: Freddie Mac (FRE) By Steve Kerch
CHICAGO (CBS.MW) -- U.S. mortgage rates rose for the thrid straight week on the heels of positive economic news, pushing the national average on the benchmark 30-year loan to 5.89 percent from 5.79% a week earlier, Freddie Mac (FRE) said Thursday. Rates have now jumped half a percentage point off their lows of 5.38 percent on March 18. The 15-year loan. popular with refinancers, also rose again to 5.23 percent from 5.112 percent. One-year, Treasury-indexed adjustable-rate loans moved up much more moderately, to 3.69 percent from 3.65 percent in the week ending Thursday.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (4372)4/15/2004 11:04:24 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Bank of Canada Summary of Monetary Policy Report
Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:39:00 PM

OTTAWA (MktNews) - The following is the summary statement released Thursday morning by the Bank of Canada of its periodic Monetary Policy Report:

"The Bank of Canada today released its April Monetary Policy Report, which reviews economic and financial trends in the context of Canada's inflation-control strategy.

"The Canadian economy continues to adjust to developments in the global economy, such as stronger world demand, higher commodity prices, and the realignment of world currencies, including the Canadian dollar. Emerging-market economies, especially China and India, are contributing to intensified competition but are also creating new trading opportunities for Canada.

"These developments require shifts in activity among sectors and create a need for adjustments by many businesses. Monetary policy is facilitating these adjustments by supporting aggregate demand, with the goal of keeping the economy near its full potential and inflation on target.

"The Canadian economy was affected by a number of shocks in 2003. Thus, despite a broadening of the global economic recovery and higher commodity prices, economic growth in Canada at the end of the year was well below the level projected by the Bank in its October Monetary Policy Report. Preliminary indications are that growth in the first quarter of this year was marginally below 3%. The Bank's view is that the economy is operating significantly below its potential.

"The Bank's outlook for economic growth and inflation is essentially unchanged from that of the January Monetary Policy Report Update. The economy is expected to grow by about 2 3/4% in 2004, picking up to about 3 3/4% in 2005. This stronger growth is expected to come from private domestic demand, reflecting the current monetary stimulus in the economy and high levels of business and consumer confidence. Such growth would return the economy to close to its production potential by the third quarter of 2005. Core inflation -- which removes the most volatile components of the consumer price index and the impact of indirect taxes on the remaining components -- should average 1 1/2% over the remainder of this year. As excess supply in the economy diminishes, core inflation is expected to move back to 2% by the end of 2005.

"The main uncertainty for the outlook continues to relate to how the Canadian economy adjusts to global developments. Overall, the risks to the outlook appear balanced."

fxstreet.com