Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (39516)	4/15/2004 2:09:48 AM
From: Michelino	Respond to of 793843

Because the winner of plurality lost in 2000 it was another kettle of fish. Bush's "victory" was a lot smellier than Clinton's in 1992 or Nixon's in 1968 (when my guy lost and Nixon got only 43%). I know that every post from a liberal fills you guys with partisan paranoia. But just so you follow my drift, I'll mention again that I do not question Nixon's mandate of 1968...but I do question 2000. You probably thought it stunk as well: I'll make a wild guess that is one of the reason you are so sensitive about it. And we haven't even mentioned Fraud at the Polls(!) although I won't do again soon if you won't.