Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (5998)	4/15/2004 11:02:42 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

<<<Regular Arab Joe Sixpacks? Check again.... More likely, the mug shots disclosed by US authorities in the hours following the crashes were that of would-be CIA informants/plants. The alleged squadron leader Mohammed Atta was probably a supergrass working for the CIA in Egypt or Saudi Arabia or... whatever! They all got written off by their US employer--actually, they were very likely wasted BEFORE September 11th, 2001 as an "insurance cover-up" in case things turned sour --which they did.>>> Gus, Lately I've mostly been skipping over your posts, for the simple reason they contain so little in the way of content. As close as I can tell, you haven't bothered to research anything related to 9/11 that would give you a basis to draw conclusions from. Perhaps you should start your own thread for those interested in writing fantasy pieces. Accounts vary, but at least 4 of the hijackers have been positively identified as being alive, with up to 4 more that have been identified under circumstances I would consider to be less than conclusive. Since their names and photos were published, the possibility of a chance similarity in names is pretty much eliminated. In the case of several others, there is at least some circumstantial evidence they were not who the official story claims they were. Atta for example, when addressed in a language in which he was known to be fluent, drew a blank stare and was unable to respond. While hardly conclusive, it does raise questions about his identity. In the mean time, there should have been at least something in the way of photographic evidence to positively identify the hijackers. Considering how much trouble they went to in the way of being noticed, it's passing strange the official story contains so little in the way of positive identification, and continues to include positively mistaken identifications. Were there security cameras at the airports? Passport photos on file? How about photos from their pilot licenses? Signature cards from their bank accounts? Finger prints collected from their residences or cars? Records of their movements from country to country. Checks of passenger lists? Records of their identities in other countries to match against finger prints? Good old police work might not have positively identified all the hijackers, but it should have made it flat out impossible to get wrong answers. So... check again? Checking again would be a great idea for the multi million dollar 9/11 Commission. In the mean time the information in the public domain proves who some of the hijackers were not, but to date there is nothing credible to substantiate who they were.

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (5998)	5/11/2004 11:22:26 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Gustave > They all got written off by their US employer --actually, they were very likely wasted BEFORE September 11th, 2001 as an "insurance cover-up" in case things turned sour I like your idea that they were all CIA agents which makes a lot of sense considering that OBL was a CIA asset and Al Qaeda, a CIA "terrorist" construct in Afghanistan similar to the KLA in Kosovo. But I'm still pondering why the "hijackers" would have to have been "eliminated"? If they were fictional to start with and with assumed identities etc, they simply evaporated --- pouf --- and were no more. Some definitely were fictional because they are/were still alive --- so why not all? OK, Mohamed Atta is a special case just to show that a "real" one actually exists.