SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michelino who wrote (39547)4/15/2004 6:15:21 AM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 793964
 
No one here has really attempted to deny that the Electoral College subverts the principle of one-man one-vote. (And for good reason as the institution was actually designed for that very purpose!) So I'll assume there is agreement and move on after posting a few closing points from a link:

For a good reason, the principle of "one man one vote" isn't espoused anywhere in the Constitution. As a matter of fact, regarding Presidential elections, the Const. merely stipulates that the States provide for how electors are chosen for the EC. Technically, as far as I am aware, a State legislature could choose its slate without holding a popular vote in the state at all.

But anyway, on to other matters...

Derek



To: Michelino who wrote (39547)4/15/2004 2:27:22 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Respond to of 793964
 
3) It gives small states undue influence in Presidential contests: Idaho gets 4 electoral votes and California gets 55 votes. However, a truly proportional system would give California 87 electoral votes (using the total votes cast in the 2000 election). The small states already get sufficient extra-representation in the Senate - they don't need this added bonus;

You are free to move to Idaho, Wyoming (or Florida) if you want to have undue political influence...

And you know to change any of this requires a constitutional amendment. You are free to pursue that approach as well. Good luck and let us know when two thirds of the states ratify the new constitutional amendment.